Farm Subsidy information
Delta County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Delta County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 379
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Delta County, Michigan totaled $21,923,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alfred Gareau | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $126,497 |
42 | Terrence Chesebro | Escanaba, MI 49829 | $125,115 |
43 | Donald Anderson | Escanaba, MI 49829 | $122,837 |
44 | Jerry Knudson | Rapid River, MI 49878 | $120,445 |
45 | David R Hayes | Rock, MI 49880 | $119,674 |
46 | Kleiman Forest Products Inc | Wilson, MI 49896 | $114,090 |
47 | Lancour Farms | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $112,794 |
48 | Rpr Contractors And Equipment Co | Escanaba, MI 49829 | $109,432 |
49 | Alan Spaulding | Garden, MI 49835 | $105,941 |
50 | John E Denholm | Garden, MI 49835 | $104,212 |
51 | Clyde Hammersmith Farm | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $101,721 |
52 | Kanerva Forest Products Inc | Rock, MI 49880 | $100,363 |
53 | Matt Guindon | Cornell, MI 49818 | $97,545 |
54 | Timothy Kinsey | Cornell, MI 49818 | $96,666 |
55 | Miron And Son Dairy Farm | Cornell, MI 49818 | $92,960 |
56 | Beverly Ann Nault | Escanaba, MI 49829 | $85,036 |
57 | Nicholas A Dalgord | Garden, MI 49835 | $82,030 |
58 | Lafleur Forest Products LLC | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $80,252 |
59 | Michael Lindquist | Bark River, MI 49807 | $73,959 |
60 | Donald J Nault | Escanaba, MI 49829 | $72,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”