Farm Subsidy information
Eaton County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Eaton County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 514
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eaton County, Michigan totaled $9,108,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Bruce F Griffith | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $13,511 |
102 | Clint Jason Hoppes | Vermontville, MI 49096 | $13,359 |
103 | Scott A Huggett | Bellevue, MI 49021 | $13,256 |
104 | Rodger Hisler | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $13,001 |
105 | Michael R Bingham | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $12,925 |
106 | Judy M Harrington | Dimondale, MI 48821 | $12,475 |
107 | Mark Jacobs | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $12,402 |
108 | Robert L Boehmer | Bellevue, MI 49021 | $11,866 |
109 | David Geisenhaver | Potterville, MI 48876 | $11,633 |
110 | Danny D Metcalf | Mulliken, MI 48861 | $11,365 |
111 | Vaughn Buchholz | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $11,202 |
112 | Mark T Vierk | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $11,167 |
113 | Jacob Roger Coburn | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $11,042 |
114 | James Mott | Olivet, MI 49076 | $10,951 |
115 | Michael Stanke | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $10,873 |
116 | Keith Tirrell | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $10,814 |
117 | Joshua Harris | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $10,784 |
118 | Big Valley Farms LLC Thomas Griffin Sole Mbr | Nashville, MI 49073 | $10,557 |
119 | Murray Marsh | Dimondale, MI 48821 | $10,476 |
120 | Jeffrey Blust | Dimondale, MI 48821 | $10,476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”