Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Eaton County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 72
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Eaton County, Michigan totaled $107,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Matthew F Miller | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $1,557 |
22 | Russell L Kiplinger | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $1,506 |
23 | Bradford S Heinze | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $1,406 |
24 | Jacob S Matthews | Sunfield, MI 48890 | $1,308 |
25 | Jeffrey Locke | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $1,148 |
26 | Britt D Mott | Olivet, MI 49076 | $1,145 |
27 | Noel L Rogers | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $1,120 |
28 | Donald Guy Walters II | Olivet, MI 49076 | $1,082 |
29 | Chris Densmore | Bellevue, MI 49021 | $1,076 |
30 | Samuel Catey | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $1,056 |
31 | John E Garity Jr | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $1,027 |
32 | Kirk W Catey | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $1,022 |
33 | Richard T Baker | Vermontville, MI 49096 | $1,013 |
34 | Pixley Dairy Farm LLC | Nashville, MI 49073 | $991 |
35 | Penny J Vance | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $950 |
36 | Brian Harris | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $886 |
37 | Armon Southworth | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $885 |
38 | Lyon Farm LLC | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $787 |
39 | John Christopher Braska | Charlotte, MI 48813 | $714 |
40 | Steven E Roth | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”