Farm Subsidy information
Gladwin County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Gladwin County, Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 65
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gladwin County, Michigan totaled $915,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gary Ballard | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $1,598 |
42 | Kim Bock | Rhodes, MI 48652 | $1,487 |
43 | Linda Brown | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $1,341 |
44 | Roger Heath | Los Fresnos, TX 78566 | $1,328 |
45 | Julie Beck | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $1,328 |
46 | Chester J Krzyzaniak | Rhodes, MI 48652 | $1,296 |
47 | Michael J Krzyzaniak | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $1,296 |
48 | Michael Stumpfig | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $1,163 |
49 | Robert E Truckle | Linwood, MI 48634 | $1,112 |
50 | Frieda Ehle | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $1,079 |
51 | Daniel Chomas | Rhodes, MI 48652 | $1,058 |
52 | Craig Dassay | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $1,001 |
53 | George Breault | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $998 |
54 | Lisa Easlick | Hartland, MI 48353 | $861 |
55 | Robert Cadwell | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $800 |
56 | Stacy Klein | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $795 |
57 | Rebecca Nicklyn | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $668 |
58 | Michael Easlick | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $600 |
59 | Jodie Haller | Beaverton, MI 48612 | $450 |
60 | Jacob Richard Dorn | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”