Conservation Reserve Program in Gladwin County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 304
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Gladwin County, Michigan totaled $7,650,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Scott Whalen | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $22,554 |
102 | Roger Mc Intosh | East Tawas, MI 48730 | $21,975 |
103 | Joyce Breault | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $21,776 |
104 | Margaret Gorman | Harrison, MI 48625 | $21,562 |
105 | Gerald Landenberger | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $21,466 |
106 | Woodring Buckeye Hunt Club LLC | Birch Run, MI 48415 | $21,322 |
107 | Guerdon Elmer Schumacher | Beaverton, MI 48612 | $21,105 |
108 | Wolverine Hunting Club | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $21,088 |
109 | John Slagle | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $20,836 |
110 | Howard Tuck | Coleman, MI 48618 | $20,679 |
111 | Tim Foor | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $20,385 |
112 | Fredrick K Kruger | Gillette, WY 82718 | $20,374 |
113 | Harold Kile Sr | Flint, MI 48507 | $20,264 |
114 | Ann David | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $20,132 |
115 | Chester J Krzyzaniak | Rhodes, MI 48652 | $19,887 |
116 | Beatrice Breault | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $19,843 |
117 | Mike Conley | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $19,780 |
118 | Jonathan Conley | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $19,486 |
119 | Roy E Zimmer | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $19,467 |
120 | Thomas Blonde Jr | Gladwin, MI 48624 | $19,058 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”