Farm Subsidy information
Grand Traverse County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 46
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $1,642,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $2,410 | |
22 | Manigold Orchards Dba | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,288 |
23 | Acme Cherries LLC | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $1,832 |
24 | Isaiah S Wunsch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,811 |
25 | Dreves Bros. Farms LLC | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $1,701 |
26 | Ochs Orchard LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,607 |
27 | Orchard View Farms LLC | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $1,316 |
28 | , | $1,298 | |
29 | Franklin Yanska | Grawn, MI 49637 | $1,249 |
30 | Taft Family Partnership Lp | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,028 |
31 | Gore Ridge Farms, Inc. | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $899 |
32 | Cultured Ferments Company LLC | Traverse City, MI 49685 | $750 |
33 | Tiffany Gregory Dba | Buckley, MI 49620 | $750 |
34 | Great Northern Roasting Company LLC | Traverse City, MI 49685 | $750 |
35 | Rigan Estate Vineyards, LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $645 |
36 | Seventh Hill Farm LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $623 |
37 | , | $616 | |
38 | A & T Kroupa Farm LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $595 |
39 | Arnold Wurm | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $552 |
40 | Jennifer Youker | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”