Total Conservation Programs in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 112
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $1,193,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel Fouch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $18,825 |
22 | Marc Santucci | East Lansing, MI 48823 | $18,647 |
23 | Orchard View Farms LLC | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $18,571 |
24 | Richard Vanpelt | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $18,443 |
25 | Deanna Evans | Grand Ledge, MI 48837 | $18,414 |
26 | Robert K Manigold | Old Mission, MI 49673 | $18,308 |
27 | George Kolarik | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $18,308 |
28 | Walter & Ward Johnson Company, LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $18,061 |
29 | Raymond Fouch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $17,564 |
30 | Cheryl L Kroupa | Old Mission, MI 49673 | $17,378 |
31 | John T Hemming | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $17,288 |
32 | Richard Sayler | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $16,739 |
33 | George Mcmanus Jr | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $16,260 |
34 | Larry Cornell | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $15,982 |
35 | Arnold Wurm | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $15,376 |
36 | Ronald Bott | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $15,206 |
37 | Cresent Hill Fruit Farms | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $14,843 |
38 | Lawrence B Slade | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $12,772 |
39 | Janet Ruddy | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $12,227 |
40 | Charrie A Kolndorfer | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $11,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”