Tree Assistance Program in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 62
Recipients of Tree Assistance Program from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $382,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tree Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | The Deanstead Inc | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,278 |
42 | Ward Johnson | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,175 |
43 | Barbara J Springer Grays Fruit | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,173 |
44 | Daniel Dohm | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,161 |
45 | Mark D Kelly | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,655 |
46 | Gore Ridge Farms, Inc. | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,616 |
47 | Uncle Bill's Orchard LLC | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $1,606 |
48 | Carl Dreves | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $1,481 |
49 | Mark Johnson | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,377 |
50 | Daniel Fouch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,295 |
51 | Dennis Bee | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,215 |
52 | Thomas F Kroupa | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $1,209 |
53 | Carroll & Sons Fruit Farms | Salt Lake City, UT 84102 | $1,026 |
54 | William James Hoffman | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $866 |
55 | Raymond Fouch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $835 |
56 | Gary Yankee | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $730 |
57 | Rohl Donald Delete | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $565 |
58 | David Shultz | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $389 |
59 | William A Rennie | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $385 |
60 | Shirley A Fuller | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $184 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”