Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 145
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $2,533,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel Fouch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $11,817 |
62 | Daniel Hall | Traverse City, MI 49685 | $11,596 |
63 | Olds Brothers Maple Syrup | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $11,494 |
64 | Daryl Lehn | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $11,480 |
65 | Jeff Zenner | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $11,168 |
66 | David W Youker | Grawn, MI 49637 | $10,698 |
67 | Leo Kreiser | Buckley, MI 49620 | $10,546 |
68 | David Pahl | Buckley, MI 49620 | $10,478 |
69 | Walter & Ward Johnson Company, LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $10,437 |
70 | Brad Fox | Buckley, MI 49620 | $9,683 |
71 | Kneale Weber | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $9,579 |
72 | Everett Casey Youker | Buckley, MI 49620 | $8,675 |
73 | The Royal Stag Farm LLC | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $8,652 |
74 | Raymond Fouch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $8,329 |
75 | Norconk Farm | Honor, MI 49640 | $7,950 |
76 | Taft Family Partnership Lp | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $7,884 |
77 | Mario Tabone | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $7,182 |
78 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $7,159 |
79 | Tim Holman | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $6,981 |
80 | Gore Ridge Farms, Inc. | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $6,894 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”