Total Commodity Programs in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 410
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $10,808,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Island View Orchards | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $21,134 |
102 | D & W Farms LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $21,043 |
103 | James C Lautner | Cedar, MI 49621 | $20,956 |
104 | Warren Orchards LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $20,710 |
105 | Pulcipher Orchards Inc | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $20,643 |
106 | Steven Robertson | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $20,440 |
107 | Jon Mead | Frankfort, MI 49635 | $19,951 |
108 | V M 3 Family L P | Springfield, IL 62708 | $19,942 |
109 | Daniel Youker | Grawn, MI 49637 | $19,678 |
110 | James H Youker | Buckley, MI 49620 | $19,371 |
111 | Frederic L Dohm | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $18,869 |
112 | Vincent Schneider | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $18,838 |
113 | Brys Vineyards LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $18,814 |
114 | Arthur T Mcmanus | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $18,791 |
115 | Max Lown | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $17,706 |
116 | Eric Svec | Buckley, MI 49620 | $17,615 |
117 | Manigold Orchards Dba | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $17,543 |
118 | Mark Barber | Lake Ann, MI 49650 | $17,302 |
119 | Vernon Jewell | Interlochen, MI 49643 | $17,088 |
120 | A & P Farms | Grawn, MI 49637 | $16,517 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”