Farm Subsidy information
Grand Traverse County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 525
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $32,276,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leobardo Ocanas | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $259,804 |
22 | Greg Dreves | Buckley, MI 49620 | $248,367 |
23 | H David Edmondson | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $241,148 |
24 | Richard Sayler | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $221,737 |
25 | Kermit Campbell | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $219,178 |
26 | Chateau Chantal | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $208,066 |
27 | William A Rennie | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $207,747 |
28 | Vanpelt Farms | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $200,439 |
29 | Wunsch Farms | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $196,053 |
30 | Carl Dreves | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $191,878 |
31 | George A Svec | Grawn, MI 49637 | $183,277 |
32 | Jim Wilson | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $180,778 |
33 | Northpoint Farms LLC | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $180,585 |
34 | Dean Farm LLC | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $179,739 |
35 | Matthew J Breithaupt | Buckley, MI 49620 | $176,047 |
36 | Johnson Farms | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $174,667 |
37 | Leonard Ligon | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $165,822 |
38 | David Weatherholt | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $164,916 |
39 | Brent H Wagner | Grawn, MI 49637 | $153,254 |
40 | Loy Putney Dba | Frankfort, MI 49635 | $149,043 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”