Farm Subsidy information
Grand Traverse County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 531
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $36,738,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Weatherholt | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $164,916 |
42 | Manigold Orchards Dba | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $164,451 |
43 | Warren Orchards LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $160,069 |
44 | Jan Malik | Buckley, MI 49620 | $155,237 |
45 | Brent H Wagner | Grawn, MI 49637 | $153,254 |
46 | Daniel Fouch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $152,090 |
47 | Schmuckal Farms | Traverse City, MI 49685 | $144,180 |
48 | Daniel L Goff | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $142,573 |
49 | Jed Hemming | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $139,121 |
50 | Kneale Weber | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $137,423 |
51 | Brys Vineyards LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $132,245 |
52 | Mario Tabone | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $131,603 |
53 | Fredric L Dohm | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $129,086 |
54 | Joseph J Weber | Buckley, MI 49620 | $120,595 |
55 | Tony Weber | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $120,488 |
56 | Marc Santucci | East Lansing, MI 48823 | $120,385 |
57 | David W Youker | Grawn, MI 49637 | $120,179 |
58 | George Kolarik | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $114,877 |
59 | Dennis Dean | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $114,656 |
60 | Raymond Fouch | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $108,955 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”