Counter Cyclical Program in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 124
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $372,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jan Malik | Buckley, MI 49620 | $4,543 |
22 | Tony Weber | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $4,538 |
23 | Edward Breitmeyer | Buckley, MI 49620 | $4,158 |
24 | Wm Larry Wagner | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $4,118 |
25 | Frank Lipinski | Buckley, MI 49620 | $3,575 |
26 | Everett Casey Youker | Buckley, MI 49620 | $3,418 |
27 | John Kratky | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $3,352 |
28 | Matthew J Breithaupt | Buckley, MI 49620 | $3,129 |
29 | Kenneth Engle | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $3,097 |
30 | Daniel Hall | Traverse City, MI 49685 | $3,050 |
31 | Sharon London | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $2,928 |
32 | Mark Barber | Lake Ann, MI 49650 | $2,880 |
33 | William Youker | Buckley, MI 49620 | $2,831 |
34 | Brad Fox | Buckley, MI 49620 | $2,796 |
35 | Blane Kreiser | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $2,765 |
36 | Elizabeth L Valade | Traverse City, MI 49685 | $2,707 |
37 | Dean Edgecomb | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,613 |
38 | Ted Pahl | Buckley, MI 49620 | $2,262 |
39 | David Pahl | Buckley, MI 49620 | $2,262 |
40 | Kneale Weber | Kingsley, MI 49649 | $2,084 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”