Tree Assistance Program in Grand Traverse County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Tree Assistance Program from farms in Grand Traverse County, Michigan totaled $362,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tree Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Loy Putney Dba | Frankfort, MI 49635 | $5,174 |
22 | Kenneth Engle | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $4,466 |
23 | Fredric L Dohm | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $4,433 |
24 | Russell J Holmes | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $4,212 |
25 | Mario Tabone | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $4,115 |
26 | Robert F Zientek | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $3,901 |
27 | Daniel L Goff | Traverse City, MI 49696 | $3,853 |
28 | Orchard Hill Farms | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $3,805 |
29 | Northpoint Farms LLC | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $3,717 |
30 | Travis James Bratschi | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $3,514 |
31 | Maitland Farms | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $3,052 |
32 | Johnson Farms | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,997 |
33 | Alfred Kniss | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,954 |
34 | V M 3 Family L P | Springfield, IL 62708 | $2,682 |
35 | Rigan Estate Vineyards, LLC | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,542 |
36 | Llewellyn D Seibold | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,433 |
37 | Pratt Farms | Old Mission, MI 49673 | $2,290 |
38 | Warren Orchards | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,289 |
39 | The Deanstead Inc | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,278 |
40 | Ward Johnson | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $2,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”