Farm Subsidy information
Gratiot County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Gratiot County, Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 288
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gratiot County, Michigan totaled $8,388,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Du Lac Farms LLC | Riverdale, MI 48877 | $6,884 |
42 | Larry E Gillis | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $6,873 |
43 | Russell And Diana Markley Revocable Trust | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $6,672 |
44 | Brian St Pierre | Riverdale, MI 48877 | $6,559 |
45 | Phillip Roberts | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $6,537 |
46 | Micheal M Hamp | Elwell, MI 48832 | $6,106 |
47 | Rodger Grant | Elwell, MI 48832 | $6,034 |
48 | Frank Sefl Jr | Ashley, MI 48806 | $5,673 |
49 | Fabus Family Farms LLC | Ashley, MI 48806 | $5,644 |
50 | Sharon Burlingame | Frederic, MI 49733 | $5,613 |
51 | Cloyd A Cordray | Ashley, MI 48806 | $5,603 |
52 | James H Gilkins Jr | Alma, MI 48801 | $5,441 |
53 | Charles F Stimson | Riverdale, MI 48877 | $5,407 |
54 | Dean J Havelka | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $5,262 |
55 | Gertrude E Burgess | Flint, MI 48507 | $5,195 |
56 | Thomas Bradley | Bannister, MI 48807 | $5,153 |
57 | Kim A Duflo Revocable Living Trust | Perrinton, MI 48871 | $5,024 |
58 | Crumbaugh Legacy Inc | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $4,916 |
59 | Gary D Stebelton | Riverdale, MI 48877 | $4,901 |
60 | Robert Hollabaugh Jr | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $4,700 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”