Farm Subsidy information
Gratiot County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Gratiot County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,368
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gratiot County, Michigan totaled $320,744,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gary Baxter | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $517,317 |
102 | J R - Farms | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $515,827 |
103 | Tracy Ross | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $509,872 |
104 | Carys Pioneer Farms | Alma, MI 48801 | $509,774 |
105 | Larry R Myers | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $501,923 |
106 | Michael Thompson | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $499,670 |
107 | Phillip Roberts | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $499,137 |
108 | Ernest C Bebow Trust | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $496,828 |
109 | Newlyn Toews | Middleton, MI 48856 | $496,510 |
110 | Melba Irene Bebow | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $495,713 |
111 | David L Mininger And Sara Grace M | Perrinton, MI 48871 | $494,517 |
112 | Fisher Farms | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $485,743 |
113 | Joseph J Fabus III | Ashley, MI 48806 | $474,300 |
114 | Fowler Farms | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $471,488 |
115 | Thomas Reeves | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $471,000 |
116 | Sidney Hull | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $470,028 |
117 | Wilson C Lauer | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $469,075 |
118 | Mark A Crumbaugh | Ashley, MI 48806 | $469,028 |
119 | Marvin Wiles | Carson City, MI 48811 | $460,228 |
120 | Cloyd A Cordray | Ashley, MI 48806 | $454,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”