Total Conservation Programs in Hillsdale County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,146
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hillsdale County, Michigan totaled $58,288,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Geraldine J Hare Revocable Trust | Williamston, MI 48895 | $113,717 |
102 | Edward Patterson | Camden, MI 49232 | $111,787 |
103 | Jeremy Milks | Addison, MI 49220 | $111,033 |
104 | Norman Crow | Camden, MI 49232 | $111,028 |
105 | Homrich Inc | Maybee, MI 48159 | $110,966 |
106 | Gene Arlie Goering Sr | Hudson, MI 49247 | $110,649 |
107 | Evelyn M Monroe Family Trust | Traverse City, MI 49686 | $109,246 |
108 | Stephen Mark Philipp | Camden, MI 49232 | $109,091 |
109 | Darel Todd | Hillsdale, MI 49242 | $107,849 |
110 | Gary E King | Reading, MI 49274 | $107,472 |
111 | Michael L Freed | Camden, MI 49232 | $106,239 |
112 | Jon D Jenkins | Camden, MI 49232 | $105,950 |
113 | Virginia Hamilton | Osseo, MI 49266 | $105,416 |
114 | Kenneth D Wrobbel | Hillsdale, MI 49242 | $105,240 |
115 | Alan Keith Avra | Coldwater, MI 49036 | $105,007 |
116 | Douglas Yearling | Pittsford, MI 49271 | $104,675 |
117 | Henry Fecker Jr | Hillsdale, MI 49242 | $102,189 |
118 | Dr Thomas J Taylor | West Unity, OH 43570 | $102,110 |
119 | Timothy M Kelley Jr | Brooklyn, MI 49230 | $101,411 |
120 | Robert K Clark | Hillsdale, MI 49242 | $100,507 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”