Farm Subsidy information
Hillsdale County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Hillsdale County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 795
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hillsdale County, Michigan totaled $10,832,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Rick Titus | North Adams, MI 49262 | $13,500 |
122 | Ellen Miller | Pittsford, MI 49271 | $13,254 |
123 | Rolling Meadow Farm LLC | Hudson, MI 49247 | $13,230 |
124 | Brandon Senior | Reading, MI 49274 | $13,023 |
125 | Randall D Nye | Camden, MI 49232 | $12,939 |
126 | South Osseo Baxter Farms LLC | Osseo, MI 49266 | $12,612 |
127 | Plainsite Farms Inc | Jonesville, MI 49250 | $12,556 |
128 | Gerald Perham | Hillsdale, MI 49242 | $12,374 |
129 | Nickolas R Benjamin | Hillsdale, MI 49242 | $12,247 |
130 | Lance Schmitt | Hillsdale, MI 49242 | $12,159 |
131 | Dustin August Meyers | Pioneer, OH 43554 | $11,950 |
132 | Larry Fether | Pittsford, MI 49271 | $11,758 |
133 | Gordon A Thomas | Litchfield, MI 49252 | $11,731 |
134 | Bradley M Blonde | Litchfield, MI 49252 | $11,718 |
135 | Philip Marry | Hudson, MI 49247 | $11,545 |
136 | Terry Jagielski | Camden, MI 49232 | $11,465 |
137 | David Stoll Jr | Jonesville, MI 49250 | $11,129 |
138 | Marshall Bros Dairy | Allen, MI 49227 | $11,017 |
139 | Stephen L Lamier | Montgomery, MI 49255 | $11,014 |
140 | Charles Earl Spencer | Jonesville, MI 49250 | $10,932 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”