Farm Subsidy information
Huron County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Huron County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 4,054
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Huron County, Michigan totaled $496,680,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Holdwick Acres LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $810,143 |
82 | James Sidney Smith | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $803,702 |
83 | William George Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $801,332 |
84 | Randy Sturm Farms | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $788,855 |
85 | Michael S Hatlas | Owendale, MI 48754 | $782,329 |
86 | Double D Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $775,351 |
87 | Kundinger Farms Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $774,238 |
88 | Roundtree Dairy LLC | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $772,546 |
89 | Albert J Gusa | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $764,500 |
90 | David George Kent | Kinde, MI 48445 | $759,821 |
91 | Willow Lane Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $755,952 |
92 | Dynasty Dairy LLC | Ruth, MI 48470 | $755,028 |
93 | William Clark Mazure | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $753,904 |
94 | E & B Miller Farms | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $739,864 |
95 | Cousin Dairy Farm LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $738,799 |
96 | Frederick Karg | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $737,949 |
97 | Larry William Roggenbuck | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $735,788 |
98 | Bayside Livestock L L C | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $731,770 |
99 | Melvin Bischer | Ruth, MI 48470 | $721,411 |
100 | Yoder Farms Inc | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $718,329 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”