Conservation Reserve Program in Huron County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 510
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Huron County, Michigan totaled $2,035,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Donna Mccatty | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $6,633 |
82 | William Perdue | Owendale, MI 48754 | $6,617 |
83 | Joyce Miller | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $6,590 |
84 | Donald F Will | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $6,494 |
85 | Terry Wayne Krohn | Elkton, MI 48731 | $6,433 |
86 | Irene Pettit | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $6,373 |
87 | Milton R Etzler | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $6,243 |
88 | Dan Guza | Ubly, MI 48475 | $6,153 |
89 | Mary E Jamieson | Owendale, MI 48754 | $6,011 |
90 | Joann Muter | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $5,951 |
91 | Lonnie Irion | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $5,946 |
92 | Hisako Champagne | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $5,916 |
93 | Daniel J Cregeur | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $5,858 |
94 | Leonard Knoblock | Kinde, MI 48445 | $5,734 |
95 | Ken Friedland | Macomb, MI 48044 | $5,613 |
96 | Dale Teschendorf | Vassar, MI 48768 | $5,599 |
97 | David Damm | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $5,598 |
98 | Leslie Weiss Jr | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $5,431 |
99 | Kenneth M Oberski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $5,427 |
100 | Daniel Kuhl | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $5,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”