Conservation Reserve Program in Huron County, Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 507
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Huron County, Michigan totaled $2,123,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Hisako Champagne | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $5,916 |
102 | Leslie Weiss Jr | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $5,757 |
103 | Ken Friedland | Macomb, MI 48044 | $5,613 |
104 | Dale Teschendorf | Vassar, MI 48768 | $5,599 |
105 | David Damm | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $5,598 |
106 | Kenneth M Oberski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $5,427 |
107 | Daniel Kuhl | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $5,402 |
108 | Marlene Schukraft | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $5,384 |
109 | Dale Christner | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $5,363 |
110 | Alan Mctaggart | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $5,321 |
111 | Nancy Eade | West Bloomfield, MI 48324 | $5,308 |
112 | Becky Weiss | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $5,308 |
113 | Ronald Kirsch | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $5,291 |
114 | James Krohn Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $5,288 |
115 | Jason Harris | Ruth, MI 48470 | $5,259 |
116 | Wayne Dubs | Owendale, MI 48754 | $5,211 |
117 | Roger K Wrubel | Caseville, MI 48725 | $5,203 |
118 | Alan Teschendorf | Collinsville, IL 62234 | $5,186 |
119 | Jerre M Lamb | Trenton, MI 48183 | $5,181 |
120 | Terry Wayne Krohn | Elkton, MI 48731 | $5,179 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”