Counter Cyclical Program in Huron County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,239
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Huron County, Michigan totaled $8,717,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Deborah Gentner-bischer | Minden City, MI 48456 | $47,849 |
| 22 | Mr Christopher Jay Jahn | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $47,806 |
| 23 | Lena Margaret Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $47,268 |
| 24 | William George Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $47,268 |
| 25 | D & D Farms Inc | Ruth, MI 48470 | $47,046 |
| 26 | Mary Weiss | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $45,413 |
| 27 | Brian J Ingram | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $44,275 |
| 28 | Baranski Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $43,864 |
| 29 | Greenfield Farm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $42,651 |
| 30 | James Krohn Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $42,613 |
| 31 | Gro-green Farms Inc | Owendale, MI 48754 | $42,543 |
| 32 | Baur Farms L L C | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $42,484 |
| 33 | Holdwick Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $41,591 |
| 34 | Ernest James Hagen | Caro, MI 48723 | $40,841 |
| 35 | Leipprandt Brothers LLC | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $40,808 |
| 36 | Donald J Long | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $40,404 |
| 37 | Tyrone F Lubeski | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $40,391 |
| 38 | Wayne F Lubeski | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $40,391 |
| 39 | Merle Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $39,215 |
| 40 | Donald Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $39,215 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf