Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Ingham County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 295
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Ingham County, Michigan totaled $16,009,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Keith Wilson | Onondaga, MI 49264 | $44,553 |
82 | Larry A Eifert | Mason, MI 48854 | $44,289 |
83 | Dennis C Smith | Stockbridge, MI 49285 | $43,209 |
84 | Casey Moore | Mason, MI 48854 | $41,409 |
85 | Weber Farms | Leslie, MI 49251 | $40,981 |
86 | Buckingham Farms LLC | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $40,314 |
87 | John Charles Linn | Williamston, MI 48895 | $39,878 |
88 | Edwin Snyder Dunlap | Rives Junction, MI 49277 | $38,630 |
89 | Bruce Harris | Dansville, MI 48819 | $38,473 |
90 | Bruce D Noel | Leslie, MI 49251 | $37,786 |
91 | John Coy | Mason, MI 48854 | $37,747 |
92 | Norwood Mills | Dansville, MI 48819 | $36,569 |
93 | Rg Farms | Williamston, MI 48895 | $35,768 |
94 | Keith Klee | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $34,069 |
95 | Graf Farms LLC | Stockbridge, MI 49285 | $32,245 |
96 | Richard Dickinson | Perry, MI 48872 | $32,134 |
97 | Jorgensen Farms Gen 4 LLC | Williamston, MI 48895 | $31,752 |
98 | David C Dunsmore II | Leslie, MI 49251 | $31,573 |
99 | Coe F Emens II | Mason, MI 48854 | $30,971 |
100 | Robert N And Joann Fogg Trust | Leslie, MI 49251 | $30,836 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”