Farm Subsidy information
Iosco County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Iosco County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 461
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Iosco County, Michigan totaled $28,877,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tony Worden | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $48,287 |
62 | Irwin Farms LLC | Barryton, MI 49305 | $47,908 |
63 | Mclean Consulting | Twining, MI 48766 | $46,046 |
64 | John Webb Jr | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $44,966 |
65 | Erma Schutte | Turner, MI 48765 | $43,191 |
66 | Ryan Ostrander | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $41,433 |
67 | Donald Look | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $39,882 |
68 | Whittemore Cattle Company | Prescott, MI 48756 | $39,069 |
69 | Kimarie Wickert | Whitesboro, TX 76273 | $38,246 |
70 | Janie Williamson | Au Gres, MI 48703 | $38,231 |
71 | Nelkie Dairy Farm L.l.c. | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $36,386 |
72 | Roger Siegrist | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $36,302 |
73 | Lyle Newberry | Davison, MI 48423 | $36,204 |
74 | Joe Kimmerer | Hale, MI 48739 | $35,733 |
75 | Jason S Bischoff | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $34,868 |
76 | Rick Warner | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $34,808 |
77 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $34,713 |
78 | Joanne Rohn | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $34,593 |
79 | Matthew A Bischoff | Turner, MI 48765 | $34,163 |
80 | Mark Gingerich | National City, MI 48748 | $33,810 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”