Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Iosco County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 115
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Iosco County, Michigan totaled $2,025,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger Gibson | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $2,460 |
82 | Roger Drew Earl | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $2,428 |
83 | James Klish | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $2,309 |
84 | Todd Stodolak | Standish, MI 48658 | $2,195 |
85 | Arnie La Pratt | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $2,185 |
86 | Lynn Erickson | Prescott, MI 48756 | $2,060 |
87 | Glen Erickson | Bay City, MI 48706 | $2,060 |
88 | William Katterman | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $2,040 |
89 | Nicola Ciranni | Clinton Twp, MI 48038 | $1,944 |
90 | Manuel Fernandez | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,734 |
91 | Matthew Kaiser | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,656 |
92 | Mitchell Creek LLC | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,494 |
93 | John Webb II | East Tawas, MI 48730 | $1,418 |
94 | Matthew A Bischoff | Turner, MI 48765 | $1,414 |
95 | Allen Miller | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,403 |
96 | Harold Miller | East Tawas, MI 48730 | $1,403 |
97 | Ervin L Biggs | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,391 |
98 | Dale Runyan | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,329 |
99 | Lois M Carmichael | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,262 |
100 | Sheila Whiting | Prescott, MI 48756 | $1,231 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”