Market Loss Assistance Program in Iosco County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 196
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Iosco County, Michigan totaled $1,420,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Arnold Ludeking | Ridgeway, IA 52165 | $2,000 |
82 | Donald Holzheuer | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,938 |
83 | James Carmichael | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,765 |
84 | Sandra Freeman | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,687 |
85 | Clarence Lossing | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,686 |
86 | Robert Streeter | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,660 |
87 | John Katterman | East Tawas, MI 48730 | $1,645 |
88 | Helen Mark | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,614 |
89 | Karl Berg | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,610 |
90 | Russell Anschuetz | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,606 |
91 | Thomas Bain Jr | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,559 |
92 | Mildred Ritter | Prudenville, MI 48651 | $1,551 |
93 | Dale Runyan | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,537 |
94 | Mark Bischoff | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,525 |
95 | Arthur Sczepkowski | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,454 |
96 | Renae Hall | Mount Morris, MI 48458 | $1,436 |
97 | Charles Paul Kaiser | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,342 |
98 | George Kerezsi Jr | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,324 |
99 | Genice Berg | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,322 |
100 | Harvey H Brinkman | Oscoda, MI 48750 | $1,307 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”