Production Flexibility Program in Iosco County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 215
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Iosco County, Michigan totaled $2,210,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Alan Mclean | Twining, MI 48766 | $3,612 |
82 | Charles G Voorhees | Prescott, MI 48756 | $3,587 |
83 | Genice Berg | Hale, MI 48739 | $3,548 |
84 | James Carmichael | Hale, MI 48739 | $3,433 |
85 | Robert Ruth Sr | Hale, MI 48739 | $3,428 |
86 | Arnold Ludeking | Ridgeway, IA 52165 | $3,426 |
87 | Sandra Freeman | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $3,281 |
88 | Robert Streeter | Hale, MI 48739 | $3,277 |
89 | James Klish | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $3,183 |
90 | Ryan Ostrander | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $3,146 |
91 | John Katterman | East Tawas, MI 48730 | $3,146 |
92 | Clarence Lossing | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $3,141 |
93 | Ila Katterman | Hale, MI 48739 | $3,104 |
94 | Helen Mark | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $3,096 |
95 | Russell Anschuetz | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $3,083 |
96 | Roger Siegrist | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $2,954 |
97 | Mildred Ritter | Prudenville, MI 48651 | $2,735 |
98 | Richard Miracle | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $2,640 |
99 | Harry Krueger | East Tawas, MI 48730 | $2,598 |
100 | Charles Paul Kaiser | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $2,586 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”