Deficiency Payment in Iosco County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 143
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Iosco County, Michigan totaled $243,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Sara Bartlett | Rhodes, MI 48652 | $241 |
102 | Valgean Drengberg | Hale, MI 48739 | $240 |
103 | Pat Brown | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $238 |
104 | Donald E Rauschert | Saginaw, MI 48604 | $237 |
105 | Hal Katterman | Hale, MI 48739 | $234 |
106 | Brian Hall | Mount Morris, MI 48458 | $228 |
107 | Kenneth Thibault | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $225 |
108 | Faye Rouech Estate | Turner, MI 48765 | $210 |
109 | Phillip E Partlo | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $194 |
110 | William Britt | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $186 |
111 | Gerald Hayes | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $176 |
112 | Herbert Rempert | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $169 |
113 | Tom Dombroski | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $167 |
114 | Whittemore Chamber Of Commerce | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $156 |
115 | Edward Mervyn | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $149 |
116 | Donald Penman | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $144 |
117 | Letson Goedecke | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $140 |
118 | Thomas Bain Jr | Hale, MI 48739 | $136 |
119 | Alice Louine Docking | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $135 |
120 | Lavern Dittenber | Au Gres, MI 48703 | $134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”