Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Iosco County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 100
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Iosco County, Michigan totaled $275,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Floyd Pierson | Turner, MI 48765 | $1,264 |
42 | James E Mcardle | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,224 |
43 | James H Sturtevant | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,204 |
44 | Donald Stanfill | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,191 |
45 | Robert G Smith | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,161 |
46 | Brian Jordan | National City, MI 48748 | $1,154 |
47 | Ivan Watts | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,151 |
48 | Ronald Green | East Tawas, MI 48730 | $1,125 |
49 | Patrick Gibson | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,115 |
50 | Manuel Fernandez | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,102 |
51 | Clinton Loomis | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,050 |
52 | Sam Hixson | Ecorse, MI 48229 | $1,030 |
53 | Louis Katterman | Hale, MI 48739 | $985 |
54 | Patrick Al Erickson | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $837 |
55 | James Klish | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $834 |
56 | Daryn Bernard | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $794 |
57 | A D Penrod | Hale, MI 48739 | $779 |
58 | Franklin Bischoff | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $756 |
59 | Ralph Woods | East Tawas, MI 48730 | $700 |
60 | Rita Simmons | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $662 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”