Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Iosco County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 94
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Iosco County, Michigan totaled $330,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clinton Loomis | Hale, MI 48739 | $2,618 |
22 | Bilacic Farms | Turner, MI 48765 | $2,586 |
23 | Tyson Shellenbarger | Hale, MI 48739 | $2,271 |
24 | Arlen Katterman | Hale, MI 48739 | $2,180 |
25 | James Groff | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $2,158 |
26 | Matthew A Bischoff | Turner, MI 48765 | $2,135 |
27 | Barclay Ranch | Hale, MI 48739 | $2,076 |
28 | Donald Holzheuer | Hale, MI 48739 | $1,763 |
29 | Patrick Gibson | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,435 |
30 | Langes Beef & Bull Inc | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,296 |
31 | Roger Drew Earl | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,282 |
32 | J-hil Acres LLC | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,202 |
33 | Als Top Crop Service Inc | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,170 |
34 | Mervyn Farms LLC | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,150 |
35 | Jason S Bischoff | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $1,118 |
36 | Daryn Bernard | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,088 |
37 | Troy M Gawne | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $1,026 |
38 | Fredrick Strauer | Tawas City, MI 48763 | $975 |
39 | Ryan Ostrander | Whittemore, MI 48770 | $957 |
40 | Karol Shellenbarger | Hale, MI 48739 | $878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”