Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Iron County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 51
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Iron County, Michigan totaled $74,721 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Larry Piwarski | Iron River, MI 49935 | $10,177 |
2 | Carl Brousseau | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $5,661 |
3 | Phyllis Olsen | Gaastra, MI 49927 | $4,350 |
4 | Michael D Brzoznowski | Iron River, MI 49935 | $4,114 |
5 | Jon Ahlberg | Iron River, MI 49935 | $4,028 |
6 | David Stanek | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $4,026 |
7 | David J Baumgartner | Iron River, MI 49935 | $3,663 |
8 | James Shepich | Caspian, MI 49915 | $3,306 |
9 | Eugene Momont | Iron River, MI 49935 | $3,015 |
10 | Jerry Bortolini Hope Farm | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $2,790 |
11 | Matthew Suheski | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $2,546 |
12 | Marlin Earl Gunderson | Amasa, MI 49903 | $1,809 |
13 | Stanley Victorovich Jr | Gaastra, MI 49927 | $1,764 |
14 | Brule River Farm | Iron River, MI 49935 | $1,698 |
15 | James Kurtz | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $1,687 |
16 | Donna Ahlberg | Iron River, MI 49935 | $1,629 |
17 | Harry H Hill | Iron River, MI 49935 | $1,447 |
18 | John J Kudwa | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $1,304 |
19 | Mark Selmo | Gaastra, MI 49927 | $1,148 |
20 | Jerry Bortolini | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $1,071 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>