Farm Subsidy information
Iron County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Iron County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 133
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Iron County, Michigan totaled $2,066,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Deer Land Farms Inc | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $35,779 |
22 | Donna Ahlberg | Iron River, MI 49935 | $33,902 |
23 | James Kurtz | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $32,675 |
24 | Chester Kudwa Estate | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $31,516 |
25 | Marlin Earl Gunderson | Amasa, MI 49903 | $27,147 |
26 | Phyllis Olsen | Gaastra, MI 49927 | $26,527 |
27 | David Stanek | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $26,414 |
28 | Joann K Hill | Iron River, MI 49935 | $25,521 |
29 | Shamco Inc | Iron River, MI 49935 | $23,064 |
30 | Carl Brousseau | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $22,444 |
31 | Butler Potato Farm Inc | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $21,239 |
32 | Greg Donati Trucking, Inc. | Iron River, MI 49935 | $20,480 |
33 | Sally Wiggins | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $19,945 |
34 | M&j Forest Products | Iron River, MI 49935 | $19,795 |
35 | Ponozzo Logging | Iron River, MI 49935 | $19,146 |
36 | Matthew Suheski | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $16,527 |
37 | Charles Uren Trucking LLC | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $16,098 |
38 | David J Baumgartner | Iron River, MI 49935 | $15,212 |
39 | Brickman Logging LLC | Iron River, MI 49935 | $15,211 |
40 | Peter Casagranda | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $15,151 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”