Total Commodity Programs in Iron County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 79
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Iron County, Michigan totaled $598,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Randy Peterson | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $5,424 |
22 | Willis Family Maple Farm LLC | Iron River, MI 49935 | $5,001 |
23 | Sally Wiggins | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $4,684 |
24 | Low Impact Logging Inc | Iron River, MI 49935 | $4,348 |
25 | David C Smith | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $3,821 |
26 | Donna Ahlberg | Iron River, MI 49935 | $3,343 |
27 | Erickson Potato Farm | Republic, MI 49879 | $2,617 |
28 | Steven M Nelson | Iron River, MI 49935 | $2,516 |
29 | Glen Kudwa | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $2,453 |
30 | Geoffery Goodhall | Iron River, MI 49935 | $2,431 |
31 | Johnson Brothers Inc | Sagola, MI 49881 | $2,297 |
32 | Goodhall Enterprises, Inc. | Iron River, MI 49935 | $2,237 |
33 | John James Bryan | Iron River, MI 49935 | $2,147 |
34 | Eugene Pellizzaro | Gaastra, MI 49927 | $1,927 |
35 | Robert E Nelson | Iron River, MI 49935 | $1,684 |
36 | Boreal Ventures Inc | Iron River, MI 49935 | $1,544 |
37 | Herman C Battan | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $1,405 |
38 | John J Kudwa | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $1,315 |
39 | Zane D Carlson | Iron River, MI 49935 | $1,182 |
40 | Erickson Potato Farm | Republic, MI 49879 | $1,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”