Farm Subsidy information
Isabella County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Isabella County, Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 198
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $6,971,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rawson & Rawson | Farwell, MI 48622 | $351,206 |
2 | Cornerstone Acres | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $335,560 |
3 | Mak Enterprises | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $188,644 |
4 | Mark Mcdonald Gen Ptr | Mt Pleasant, MI 48858 | $181,861 |
5 | Recker Family Farms LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $154,439 |
6 | James Kremsreiter | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $125,000 |
7 | Gene D Himebaugh | Remus, MI 49340 | $108,671 |
8 | Cow Pleasant Dairy Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $100,563 |
9 | Larry A Travis | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $83,032 |
10 | Pohl Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $82,019 |
11 | Brian Boge | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $64,675 |
12 | , | $61,368 | |
13 | William Scott Moss | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $49,280 |
14 | Tim Bissell & Lee Burk Ptr-b & B Farms | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $45,434 |
15 | Gary Noble | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $39,482 |
16 | Wagester Farms LLC | Remus, MI 49340 | $37,131 |
17 | Pasch Farms LLC | Weidman, MI 48893 | $36,469 |
18 | Engler Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $35,384 |
19 | Jon J Peacock | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $31,937 |
20 | Gary Mcdonald | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $31,529 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>