Deficiency Payment in Isabella County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 446
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $963,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Richard Stevens | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $2,983 |
102 | Lyle D Willoughby | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $2,891 |
103 | Robert J Murphy | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $2,867 |
104 | Thomas E Murphy | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $2,867 |
105 | Richard W Morris | Farwell, MI 48622 | $2,856 |
106 | Albert D Sonley | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $2,825 |
107 | Duane Recker | Alma, MI 48801 | $2,816 |
108 | Douglas Curtiss | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $2,787 |
109 | James Dague | Lake, MI 48632 | $2,714 |
110 | Donald K Gifford | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $2,706 |
111 | Steven Foster | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $2,569 |
112 | Alvin Peacock | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $2,563 |
113 | Donald J Pantenburg | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $2,551 |
114 | Patrick Schafer | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $2,504 |
115 | Bryan R House | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $2,472 |
116 | Daniel B Coughlin | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $2,467 |
117 | William Mcdonald | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $2,450 |
118 | John Parish | Clare, MI 48617 | $2,441 |
119 | Gary Curtiss | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $2,440 |
120 | Robert Loomis | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $2,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”