Market Loss Assistance Program in Isabella County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 925
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $7,096,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Norman James Geasler | Lake, MI 48632 | $16,678 |
122 | Schafer Acres Inc | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $16,503 |
123 | Lyle D Willoughby | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $16,267 |
124 | Robert Anthony Ervin | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $16,196 |
125 | Michael E Faber | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $16,056 |
126 | Gregory L Arnold Living Trust | Clare, MI 48617 | $15,898 |
127 | Alton Arnold | Clare, MI 48617 | $15,898 |
128 | Gale L Willoughby | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $15,896 |
129 | Anthony Schafer | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $15,811 |
130 | Stough Farms | Clare, MI 48617 | $15,357 |
131 | David R Wezensky | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $15,310 |
132 | Hurley Kampf | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $15,264 |
133 | Ronald Brecht | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $15,014 |
134 | Louis Brecht | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $15,014 |
135 | Gary Noble | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $15,009 |
136 | Duane Recker | Alma, MI 48801 | $14,973 |
137 | Pat J Lawler | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $14,927 |
138 | Orrin Marshall | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $14,882 |
139 | Alan V Wood | Weidman, MI 48893 | $14,801 |
140 | Ed J Faber | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $14,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”