Market Loss Assistance Program in Isabella County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 925
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $7,096,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Zeien Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $10,850 |
182 | Eberhart & Son Partnership | Clare, MI 48617 | $10,778 |
183 | Ronald Halfmann | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $10,731 |
184 | Fred R Zeien | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $10,571 |
185 | Robert L Ervin | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $10,388 |
186 | Bruno Gross | Coleman, MI 48618 | $10,076 |
187 | Donald J Pantenburg | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $9,842 |
188 | Jeffrey Simon | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $9,706 |
189 | Dennis S Curtiss | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $9,679 |
190 | Larry Caldwell | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $9,505 |
191 | Dale Brecht | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $9,392 |
192 | Rodney Ervin | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $9,322 |
193 | Melvin D Zimmerman | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $9,322 |
194 | Thomas Walker | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $9,289 |
195 | Gerald Gimmey | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $9,193 |
196 | Robert Loomis | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $9,144 |
197 | John Kenny | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $8,813 |
198 | Rodney Rapp | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $8,696 |
199 | John Recker | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $8,641 |
200 | Elmo L Mogg | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $8,626 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”