Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Isabella County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 482
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $6,598,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Galler Farms Dba | Clare, MI 48617 | $230,579 |
2 | Mark F Mcdonald | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $188,135 |
3 | Matthew Joseph Mcconnell Jr | Clare, MI 48617 | $168,775 |
4 | Robert Anthony Ervin | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $153,335 |
5 | Gary Curtiss | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $151,715 |
6 | Harold A Howard | Remus, MI 49340 | $142,268 |
7 | Cornerstone Acres | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $136,939 |
8 | John Anthony Ervin | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $132,720 |
9 | Ronald S Ervin | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $131,843 |
10 | Longview Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $120,474 |
11 | Rawson & Rawson | Farwell, MI 48622 | $119,132 |
12 | Kelly Daniel Beltinck | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $118,453 |
13 | Recker Dairy Farms | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $113,860 |
14 | Jay Curtiss | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $108,596 |
15 | Rawson Operation Inc | Farwell, MI 48622 | $96,062 |
16 | G&r Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $95,541 |
17 | Pohl Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $92,920 |
18 | James F Mcdonald | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $87,394 |
19 | Ernest Mogg | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $80,986 |
20 | Joe Ramon | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $80,499 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>