Farm Subsidy information
Isabella County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Isabella County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,104
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $169,702,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Clark Dairy Farm LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $824,159 |
| 22 | Todd Seeley | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $749,653 |
| 23 | Finnerty Beef Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $747,326 |
| 24 | R & T Murphy Farms | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $746,417 |
| 25 | Randy Recker | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $711,990 |
| 26 | Central Michigan Milk Production, LLC | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $700,347 |
| 27 | Kevin D & Kimberly A Clarke-diamond K Farms | Coleman, MI 48618 | $687,126 |
| 28 | James Lester Cary | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $679,554 |
| 29 | Pasch Dairy Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $673,467 |
| 30 | Pasch Farms LLC | Weidman, MI 48893 | $673,176 |
| 31 | House Dairy LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $671,409 |
| 32 | Foxes Dairy Farm | Mount Pleasant, MI 48804 | $660,616 |
| 33 | James F Mcdonald | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $650,959 |
| 34 | Jay Curtiss | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $632,802 |
| 35 | Pat Mcconnell | Clare, MI 48617 | $623,640 |
| 36 | Rawson Operation Inc | Farwell, MI 48622 | $615,328 |
| 37 | Recker Family Farms LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $603,838 |
| 38 | Cotter Dairy Farm | Weidman, MI 48893 | $570,071 |
| 39 | Michael Turnwald | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $564,016 |
| 40 | Engler Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $551,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf