Counter Cyclical Program in Isabella County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 717
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $2,859,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Saginaw Chippewa Tribe | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $22,677 |
22 | Engler Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $22,457 |
23 | Ernest Mogg | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $21,650 |
24 | Pasch Farms LLC | Weidman, MI 48893 | $21,461 |
25 | Joseph D Bryant | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $21,445 |
26 | Michael Klumpp | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $21,169 |
27 | Tim Bissell & Lee Burk Ptr | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $21,138 |
28 | Todd Seeley | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $19,310 |
29 | Foxes Dairy Farm | Mount Pleasant, MI 48804 | $18,926 |
30 | Gary Mcdonald | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $18,830 |
31 | Blaine E Block Living Trust | Weidman, MI 48893 | $18,404 |
32 | Lewis R Main | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $17,626 |
33 | Gross Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $17,602 |
34 | Neil Master Jr | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $17,082 |
35 | Gary Curtiss | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $16,764 |
36 | House Farms | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $16,449 |
37 | Clarend Methner | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $16,446 |
38 | Vogel Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $16,201 |
39 | Raymond F Brookens | Riverdale, MI 48877 | $15,941 |
40 | Butcher Farms | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $15,848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”