Market Loss Assistance Program in Isabella County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 925
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $7,096,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Judge Dairy Farm Inc | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $60,651 |
22 | Wilson Dairy Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $59,843 |
23 | Keith J Moeggenberg | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $59,621 |
24 | Longview Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $58,705 |
25 | Vogel Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $58,121 |
26 | James Lester Cary | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $57,287 |
27 | Clark Dairy Farm LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $56,629 |
28 | John Anthony Ervin | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $52,319 |
29 | Thomas J Murphy | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $51,890 |
30 | Cotter Dairy Farm | Weidman, MI 48893 | $51,606 |
31 | Todd Seeley | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $51,067 |
32 | Murray Mogg | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $50,944 |
33 | Foxes Dairy Farm | Mount Pleasant, MI 48804 | $45,155 |
34 | Danny Conners | Lake, MI 48632 | $45,091 |
35 | Jay Curtiss | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $44,922 |
36 | Gary Mcdonald | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $44,551 |
37 | Kelly Daniel Beltinck | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $42,615 |
38 | Bollman Brothers | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $42,367 |
39 | Michael S Moeggenberg | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $42,210 |
40 | Finnerty Beef Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $41,439 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”