Market Gains in Jackson County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 52
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Jackson County, Michigan totaled $996,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brent E Williams | Spring Arbor, MI 49283 | $13,226 |
22 | Larry Moss | Springport, MI 49284 | $10,304 |
23 | Grand Valley Farms | Rives Junction, MI 49277 | $10,286 |
24 | Charles A Doan | Hanover, MI 49241 | $10,069 |
25 | Videto Vista | Spring Arbor, MI 49283 | $8,472 |
26 | Faist Farms Inc | Pleasant Lake, MI 49272 | $8,052 |
27 | Young's Orchards | Rives Junction, MI 49277 | $7,742 |
28 | De Vere J Noakes | Albion, MI 49224 | $6,597 |
29 | Ed Dunlap Estate | Rives Junction, MI 49277 | $5,460 |
30 | Drakeland Farms LLC | Jonesville, MI 49250 | $4,881 |
31 | Drakeland Farms | Jonesville, MI 49250 | $4,549 |
32 | Grandview Farms | Jackson, MI 49201 | $4,509 |
33 | Choates Belly Acres | Cement City, MI 49233 | $3,805 |
34 | Thomas Willard Betz | Springport, MI 49284 | $3,436 |
35 | Williams Family Farm LLC | Spring Arbor, MI 49283 | $3,368 |
36 | Jeff Wollpert | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $2,605 |
37 | Dale R Thorne | Hanover, MI 49241 | $2,441 |
38 | Verd Easton | Rives Junction, MI 49277 | $2,278 |
39 | Carl Sheffer | Hanover, MI 49241 | $1,568 |
40 | Edwin Curtis | Parma, MI 49269 | $1,059 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”