Counter Cyclical Program in Jackson County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 572
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Jackson County, Michigan totaled $3,930,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | James Mock | Eaton Rapids, MI 48827 | $4,535 |
162 | Charles Reul Jr | Jackson, MI 49201 | $4,427 |
163 | De Vere J Noakes | Albion, MI 49224 | $4,389 |
164 | James Lightner | Springport, MI 49284 | $4,380 |
165 | Pregitzer Farm | Munith, MI 49259 | $4,376 |
166 | Beatrice Mcmurtrie | Parma, MI 49269 | $4,366 |
167 | Albert Denbrock | Marshall, MI 49068 | $4,355 |
168 | Norman M Faulkner | Litchfield, MI 49252 | $4,329 |
169 | James Deland | Jackson, MI 49201 | $4,295 |
170 | T H Parker | Brooklyn, MI 49230 | $4,251 |
171 | Henry Samyn | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $4,240 |
172 | Gerald W Smith | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $4,168 |
173 | Cowing Bros | Pleasant Lake, MI 49272 | $4,142 |
174 | Greg Miller | Parma, MI 49269 | $4,142 |
175 | Dwight Carmer | Rives Junction, MI 49277 | $3,979 |
176 | Weston Farm | Concord, MI 49237 | $3,906 |
177 | Clare Wahl | Grass Lake, MI 49240 | $3,896 |
178 | Duane F Fisher | Adrian, MI 49221 | $3,834 |
179 | James Caldwell Jr | Litchfield, MI 49252 | $3,751 |
180 | Ricky Mcmurtrie | Parma, MI 49269 | $3,736 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”