Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 76
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kalamazoo County, Michigan totaled $559,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lhn Enterprises LLC | Richland, MI 49083 | $8,400 |
22 | Mott Farms Inc | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $8,293 |
23 | Matthew W Gibson | Climax, MI 49034 | $7,719 |
24 | Spring Oak Farms LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $7,481 |
25 | Oswalt Family Farms LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $6,885 |
26 | Napp's Greenhouses LLC | Kalamazoo, MI 49004 | $5,694 |
27 | Skrzypek Farms LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $5,340 |
28 | The Briar Patch LLC | Mattawan, MI 49071 | $5,149 |
29 | Matthew James Fleck | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $4,801 |
30 | Gull Meadow Farms LLC | Richland, MI 49083 | $4,756 |
31 | Patricia Elisabeth Smith | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $3,390 |
32 | William Roger Klein | Mendon, MI 49072 | $2,934 |
33 | Bonita Landis | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $2,757 |
34 | Matthew James Drallette | Climax, MI 49034 | $2,520 |
35 | Angela M Crotser | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $2,408 |
36 | Branden Pollard | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $1,970 |
37 | Foster Beef LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $1,632 |
38 | Harvest Honeybee Farm LLC | Hickory Corners, MI 49060 | $1,599 |
39 | Nick Chapin | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $1,527 |
40 | John P Cagney | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $1,418 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”