Total Disaster Programs in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 254
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Kalamazoo County, Michigan totaled $7,586,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mary Lou Peck | Fulton, MI 49052 | $52,574 |
22 | Wayne A Copenhaver | Mattawan, MI 49071 | $52,128 |
23 | H James Campbell | Richland, MI 49083 | $51,199 |
24 | Gordon F Oswalt | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $49,627 |
25 | Dennis J Vankruiningen | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $48,056 |
26 | Edward John Cagney | Scotts, MI 49088 | $47,450 |
27 | Bailey Terra Nova Farms | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $44,700 |
28 | Matthew W Gibson | Climax, MI 49034 | $44,374 |
29 | Michael L Kline II | Scotts, MI 49088 | $43,655 |
30 | Allen Dee Stautz | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $43,059 |
31 | Laknoll Farms LLC | Fulton, MI 49052 | $43,015 |
32 | Verhage Fruit Farms | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $42,698 |
33 | Matthew James Fleck | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $42,684 |
34 | David Alan Frost | Mendon, MI 49072 | $42,268 |
35 | Coggan Farms Inc | Plainwell, MI 49080 | $41,612 |
36 | Walter James Stafford | Richland, MI 49083 | $40,830 |
37 | Skrzypek Farms LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $40,302 |
38 | Buckham Farms | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $38,586 |
39 | Christopher A Gallup | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $35,222 |
40 | Francis John Fleck | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $34,724 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”