Farm Subsidy information
Kalamazoo County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 214
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kalamazoo County, Michigan totaled $4,737,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Scott Leslie Stoneburner | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $1,881 |
122 | Bernard Cronkhite | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $1,872 |
123 | Leroy Walter Fink | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $1,863 |
124 | Joseph W Cagney | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $1,861 |
125 | James P Oswalt | Fulton, MI 49052 | $1,814 |
126 | Andrews Family Farm LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $1,800 |
127 | David M Perkins | Fulton, MI 49052 | $1,741 |
128 | Barbara M Smith | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $1,636 |
129 | J & J Bee Service Inc | Kalamazoo, MI 49004 | $1,620 |
130 | Donna K Perkins | Scotts, MI 49088 | $1,596 |
131 | John R Perkins | Scotts, MI 49088 | $1,596 |
132 | Kurtis Niles Wiley | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $1,475 |
133 | Kathy A Mitchell | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $1,436 |
134 | Ira J Krupp Jr | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $1,418 |
135 | Daniel Scott Perkins | Scotts, MI 49088 | $1,413 |
136 | Liberty Hill Farm LLC | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $1,313 |
137 | Phillip J Sheets | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $1,305 |
138 | Theodore Harold Holt | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $1,302 |
139 | Charles Bernath | Fulton, MI 49052 | $1,236 |
140 | Mary Lou Peck | Fulton, MI 49052 | $1,231 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”