Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 300
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Kalamazoo County, Michigan totaled $15,500,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Gary Earl Schoen Revocable Living | Climax, MI 49034 | $12,666 |
142 | David F Harper | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $11,172 |
143 | Steven T Rhoda | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $11,056 |
144 | Douglas E Meachum | Hartford, MI 49057 | $10,497 |
145 | B & B Farm | Climax, MI 49034 | $10,454 |
146 | James E Mezo | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $9,988 |
147 | Bruce Butchbaker | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $9,797 |
148 | Bernard Cronkhite | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $9,475 |
149 | Donna Rae Vanmiddlesworth | Climax, MI 49034 | $9,464 |
150 | Thomas R Byholt | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $9,390 |
151 | Jeff Fuller | Fulton, MI 49052 | $8,697 |
152 | Bernard L Bartson Trust | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $8,671 |
153 | John W Byholt Sr | Kalamazoo, MI 49002 | $8,649 |
154 | Foster Beef LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $8,465 |
155 | Michael K Swihart | Fulton, MI 49052 | $8,158 |
156 | Barbara M Smith | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $7,935 |
157 | Philip V Oswalt | Fulton, MI 49052 | $7,545 |
158 | Phillip C Curtis Jr | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $7,467 |
159 | Bolhuis Farms Incorporated | Climax, MI 49034 | $7,271 |
160 | Kenneth H Ward | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $7,166 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”