Total Disaster Programs in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 245
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Kalamazoo County, Michigan totaled $4,270,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Larry C Bennett | Fulton, MI 49052 | $21,997 |
42 | Stephen M Tomac Jr | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $20,986 |
43 | Charles Fleming | Climax, MI 49034 | $20,223 |
44 | Charles Maile | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $19,078 |
45 | Charles Roy Mcpeck | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $17,962 |
46 | Larry L Phelps | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $17,190 |
47 | Jeffrey Paul Stuck | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $16,030 |
48 | Gijsbert A Vanden Bogerd | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $15,713 |
49 | Michael L Kline II | Scotts, MI 49088 | $15,704 |
50 | Richard Ralph Eshlaman | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $15,376 |
51 | David P Rutten | Scotts, MI 49088 | $15,319 |
52 | Matthew Guin Skrzypek | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $14,426 |
53 | Myers Farms LLC | Scotts, MI 49088 | $14,138 |
54 | Anthony P Kovach | Portage, MI 49024 | $13,986 |
55 | John L Oswalt | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $13,811 |
56 | Scott Edward Jirgens | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $13,321 |
57 | Ronald Charles White | Scotts, MI 49088 | $13,041 |
58 | Bailey Terra Nova Farms | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $12,894 |
59 | French Dawnera Farms | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $12,741 |
60 | Scott P Husted | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $12,589 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”