Total Emergency Relief Program in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Kalamazoo County, Michigan totaled $1,326,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J & J Bee Service Inc | Kalamazoo, MI 49004 | $359,847 |
2 | B & T Partnership | Fulton, MI 49052 | $204,213 |
3 | Walter James Stafford Jr | Richland, MI 49083 | $123,353 |
4 | Lori Ann Stafford | Richland, MI 49083 | $123,353 |
5 | Myers Farms LLC | Scotts, MI 49088 | $82,494 |
6 | Lynn A Coville | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $56,204 |
7 | B & G Crop Farm LLC | Scotts, MI 49088 | $51,510 |
8 | Laknoll Farms LLC | Fulton, MI 49052 | $43,015 |
9 | Matthew James Fleck | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $42,684 |
10 | Christopher A Gallup | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $35,222 |
11 | Edward John Cagney | Scotts, MI 49088 | $34,921 |
12 | Aaron Wiebren Hoekstra | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $30,137 |
13 | Michael L Kline II | Scotts, MI 49088 | $27,951 |
14 | Walter James Stafford | Richland, MI 49083 | $15,221 |
15 | Matthew W Gibson | Climax, MI 49034 | $14,712 |
16 | Charles Maile | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $10,484 |
17 | Jean Ann Stafford | Richland, MI 49083 | $10,148 |
18 | Nick Chapin | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $9,705 |
19 | Branden Pollard | Galesburg, MI 49053 | $9,376 |
20 | Deboer Farm Enterprises Inc | Climax, MI 49034 | $8,801 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>