Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 175
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Kalamazoo County, Michigan totaled $9,015,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Francis John Fleck | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $124,130 |
22 | Matthew L Wagar | Climax, MI 49034 | $120,238 |
23 | John E Perkins | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $117,321 |
24 | Myers Farms LLC | Scotts, MI 49088 | $116,457 |
25 | Chad E Crotser | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $114,750 |
26 | Schug Farms | Climax, MI 49034 | $105,744 |
27 | Matthew W Gibson | Climax, MI 49034 | $104,971 |
28 | Walter James Stafford | Richland, MI 49083 | $102,222 |
29 | Justin D Weinberg | Mendon, MI 49072 | $100,951 |
30 | Steven T Rhoda | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $95,162 |
31 | Ronald Charles White | Scotts, MI 49088 | $94,365 |
32 | R & R Pork LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $88,373 |
33 | Ky10 Farms LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $87,989 |
34 | Pork 23 LLC | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $87,182 |
35 | Todd H Weinberg | Scotts, MI 49088 | $83,081 |
36 | Daniel L Fritz | Scotts, MI 49088 | $81,526 |
37 | Vlietstra Farms LLC | Kalamazoo, MI 49009 | $81,363 |
38 | Leonard C Jaworski | Vicksburg, MI 49097 | $76,831 |
39 | Angela M Crotser | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $76,499 |
40 | Edge Wood Dairy LLC | Grand Rapids, MI 49544 | $75,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”